Monday, May 20, 2013

Fast & Furious



Runtime: 107 minutes

Directed by: Justin Lin

Starring: Vin Diesel, Paul Walker, Jordana Brewster, Michelle Rodriguez

From: Universal

Finally, I am caught up on what I've watched as of late. It hasn't been movie-watching time the past few nights, so that is why I am caught up. It was my first time watching this film, one that apparently people don't like... as if the rest of the moveis in this series are high works of art or are beloved by everyone.

The plot is that Dom Toretto (Diesel) and the rest of the gang return as he and Brian O'Conner (Walker) are both looking for the same big-time heroin dealer who operates along the Mexico border in California and in fact uses drivers to smuggle drugs via an underground tunnel; O'Conner is looking for him because he's now an FBI agent; I know, I know. Dom is looking for him as his girlfriend Letty (Rodriguez) is said to be killed while working for the drug dealer. I say it's not a spoiler as hey, you know from the advertising for the 6th one that an important plot point is Letty returning. You never do see her dead body in the 4th one, so that would explain it... although that sort of ruins the motivation for Toretto, in hindsight.

It seems like that this gets a mixed reaction, with many saying it's the worst of the series. I disagree. Sure, it pales in comparsion to Fast Five, but many films in the action genre do, to be perfectly honest. I say that this is comparable overall to the first one, which means it's fine enough for me and an entertaining time. The band being back together is nice, and there being high stakes due to an important character (apparently) dying is important in adding drama. And, the action and the driving scenes are all nice and fun to watch. So that was enough for me to enjoy it and I did not think it was a waste of time or anything of that sort; I didn't need to see it when it came out but I did not hate watching it in 2013.

Also, I did not mind seeing Gal Galdot! She first appeared here and since then she's been a part of the series. I usually don't prefer model-thin ladies but looks-wise I think she is quite attractive. That is what I thought in Fast Five and it was nice to see her debut here.

I'll be back Wednesday night.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

The Fast And The Furious/2 Fast 2 Furious



Runtime: 106 minutes

Directed by: Rob Cohen

Starring: Paul Walker, Vin Diesel, Michelle Rodriguez, Jordana Brewster, Rick Yune

From: Universal


Runtime: 107 minutes

Directed by: John Singleton

Starring: Paul Walker, Tyrese, Eva Mendes, Cole Hauser

From: Universal

On this random Saturday night where I'm also watching a free UFC event at the same time (it's been average overall), I figured I should combine the first two movies in this franchise into one entry. I still haven't watched Tokyo Drift yet, but as it has little to do with the rest of the series, that'll be viewed sometime in the distant future, probably. It should be noted by me that I've never thought highly of the car culture presented in the franchise... you know, stupid lame-ass modding of your car, illegal dangerous street racing-which has killed innocent bystanders-having your car use NOS, and all that nonsense. I've always thought it was extraordinarilly stupid, to be honest.

Still, I always thought that the first movie was entertaining-enough. Sure, it's easy to poke fun of but it's fine. It's a standard old hot rod tale of a cop, Brian O'Connor (Walker) going undercover into that culture to try and find out who is heisting trucks with modded cars. He doesn't want to believe but turns out it's the group of people led by Dom Toretto (Diesel); the fact that Brian has fallen in love with Dom's sister Mia (Brewster) complicates things. A rival Asian gang led by Johnny Tran (Yune) is also involved.

Like I said, I always thought this was fine. All the driving is fine to watch and aside from the whole hijacking and illegal racing thing, Dom and his crew really are not THAT bad... as long as you're able to at least tolerate the culture depicted here, then this is inoffensive entertainment. I never imagined back then that the series would still be going on and it would lead to something like Fast Five.

I also saw 2 Fast 2 Furious back in the day, and I never really cared for it. The plot is that Brian O'Connor is now an ex-cop and on the run for letting Dom go instead of arresting him. He ends up in Miami and he has to help the feds on a case to bring down a drug lord; this is all done via a simple drug shipment with a pair of automobiles. Monica Fuentes (Mendes) also works for the feds and has been undercover for the past year. Brian enlists the help of his old frienemy Roman Pearce (Tyrese).

Even now, this movie was eh for me. There are some fun moments but everything just seems slight and inconsequential. There are plenty of stupid moments, too, and usually in a bad way; I don't even want to get started on the scene with the rat, an upside down bucket on Mark Boone Junior's stomach, and a blowtorch. There's plenty of CGI and a lot of it... not so hot 10 years later. I don't know what to make of the incredibly homoerotic relationship between Brian and Roman. Roman takes his shirt off when he's around Brian for no real reason, and he disapproves of the budding relationship brewing with Brian and Monica. He does not like it... is it because he wants Brian for himself? That's fine with me, homosexuality and all that; I just imagine that wasn't what the filmmakers were going for.

I know that some like this film; it's not for me. Maybe the title being so goofy is a sign as to its quality. I'll be back Monday night.

Friday, May 17, 2013

Blazing Saddles



Runtime: 93 minutes

Directed by: Mel Brooks

Starring: Clevon Little, Gene Wilder, Slim Pickens, Harvey Korman, Madeline Kahn

From: Warner Brothers

I have seen this classic spoof movie before but the last time I saw it in full was years ago, and on Wednesday night before I went to see the Star Trek doubleheader; that is why I went to Cinemark in Orlando rather than any other place that had the double header; for the past few Wednesdays they've been showing older movies on the big screen, like Raging Bull and Alien, the latter of which I saw on the big screen a few years ago. This upcoming Wednesday, Cleopatra. I've never seen that before but it's 4 hours long! I doubt I'll be checking it out. I've heard about the massive problems with that film and that may be more interesting than the actual film itself.

Anyhow, you should know the plot to this already, as I hope that most people have seen this, but in short... a corrupt politician (Korman) gets the inept governor (Brooks) to appoint the African-American Bart (Little) to be the sheriff to Rock Ridge in the hope to get all the citizens to leave as it would be cheaper for him to do it that way. Turns out, after some hesitation they end up liking him and his pal The Waco Kid (Wilder).

I've always enjoyed this movie, even as a kid (yes, I saw it when I was under 18). Sure, it's absurdist and anachronistic but it's often hilarious, with many quotable lines and memorable moments. I am sure that Spike Lee hates the film due to all the times that “the N word” gets uttered, but hey that's how it was during the time period and this is a satire so that is OK; you don't always have to be politically correct; it just depends on what it is, and I imagine there would be trouble getting a movie like this made today.

Anyhow, the crowd I saw this with was bigger than expected, so it was nice to watch a very funny movie with a crowd that laughed at all of the humorous moments. Good times. Speaking of humorous moments, I wonder what it would have been like had John Wayne accepted the offer to cameo in the movie, as was offered to him. He promised to see it but needless to say this was way out there for a conservative guy like him. I laugh how a few years ago someone said that Wayne was offered the Taggert part, played by Pickens. I think someone was confused there, but it would have been amazing to have heard The Duke utter racial slurs, been in a scene where many people pass gas due to eating beans and using phrases like “Kansas City fa****s”.

I was glad to see that movie in that way. I'll be back tomorrow night.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Star Trek ('09) & Star Trek Into Darkness




95% on Rotten Tomatoes (out of 297 reviews)

Runtime: 127 minutes

Directed by: J.J. Abrams

Starring: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Eric Bana, Karl Urban, Zoe Saldana

From: Paramount



Runtime: 132 minutes

Directed by: J.J. Abrams

Starring: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Benedict Cumberbatch, Karl Urban, Peter Weller

From: Paramount

Yep, here is me talking about the two latest Star Trek films. I've already talked about my history with the whole series so I won't recap that. Sad to say I ended up coming across some spoilers for Into Darkness and one of them was me stumbling onto a webpage and that may have been a dumb error on my part; the other spoilers, though, it was people being blabbermouths and I am not happy about that as I would have preferred not having that knowledge beforehand. When I talk about Into Darkness I'll be non-spoiler then I'll hide my spoiler thoughts with white text so you have to highlight it to read it.

As for the '09 film, there are several things I could carp about but overall it's minor stuff and I happen to enjoy the film. It certainly opens in a strong way, with Nero's ship from the future destroying the USS Kelvin and Kirk's father being brave and giving up his life to save the lives of many, then you see how the crew got together and met each other, and this establishes that these movies are in an alternate universe from the original series and films, so they can do whatever they want to, like Spock & Uhara being lovers, or what have you. It's fine big-budget entertainment that's also part of a legendary franchise and I say it works fine in both realms.

Last night at midnight I saw Into Darkness, and sad to say it's a typical sequel, meaning it's inferior. It isn't awful; it's just that with the pluses and the minuses, it turns out to be average overall. I've seen some sequels this year that were awful (I'm looking in your general direction, A Good Day To Die Hard); this isn't that but I was hoping it'd be good. At least there are exciting scenes... you know, big action setpieces and all that, and there are other sorts of entertaining moments. But it's the script and story that let it down. I wish they wouldn't have made some of the choices that they chose to make, I'll put it that way.

Like I said, it's not awful; it's just disappointing due to the missteps they made. At least Cumberbatch was cool as... well, whatever villain he was. I'll be back tomorrow night. Now, onto MAJOR SPOILERS, so don't highlight and read it unless you don't care to see the movie at all or you're just that damn curious.

Of course Benedict Cumberbatch is Khan, despite not looking like he's from India nor even looking Mexican like the original Khan. This is never explained. The whole thing with Peter Weller's character being an important member of Starfleet and yet ends up being the villain... I have little problem with the general idea. How it was executed, though... doesn't always make sense. 

But boy do they do a lot of fan service for the hardcore Trekkers, but real obvious things so I don't know how they would feel about all the references or how entire blocks of dialogue and plot points are taken from Wrath of Khan but modified so that it'd be different and it would surprise people... yeah, I could have done without that. But the deus ex machina that gets introduced late in the movie to bring back someone from the dead... it just seems lame and unneeded, as if the death ended up not meaning a whole lot if he wasn't gone for long before being revived in a contrived way. Wrath of Khan, this isn't, that is for sure. Too much stupidity and I wish the script and story would have been more solid.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

A Bonus Star Trek Related Post

I did make a post last night where I stated I wouldn't be back here until Thursday night, but I do need to mention a few things:

I should have mentioned while talking about Star Trek IV that the original idea was to have EDDIE MURPHY be the guy who assists the crew in 1986, not a lady. I've heard different reasons why this wasn't to be. It's probably several different things, but Eddie ended up doing The Golden Child instead, a movie not well-received and he's regretted it since then, as I know from comedy shows he did before 1986 that he's a legit Star Trek fan; who knows how that would have turned out... it either would have been amazing or atrocious.

Regarding that punk song I provided a video for last time... it was actually a song created by the movie producers and crew as the original song they had was deemed "not punk enough". How about that?

Finally, last night I was looking at something not even related to Star Trek Into Darkness and I have a feeling I got spoiled on something pretty big that I did not want to be spoiled on. Figures, but I am not happy about it. It happened 48 hours before I was to see the new movie, too. At least Thursday I'll be talking about that film, but in vague terms of course as I won't be spoiling anything.

Monday, May 13, 2013

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home



Runtime: 119 minutes

Directed by: Leonard Nimoy

Starring: William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, the rest of the main crew of the Starship Enterprise, and there's Catherine Hicks too

From: Paramount

Yep, here is the way out into left field entry in the original Star Trek movie series, one that understandably divides people due to how different it is. What a bold choice, but I suppose fortune favors the bold, like longtime actor Jonathan Goldsmith, a.k.a. The Dos Equis Guy says as The Most Interesting Man In The World. Yeah, he's a longtime actor and one of these days I need to watch one of the movie he is featured prominently in. Awhile back I did see a decent amount of this on Ion TV one Saturday night while killing time waiting to go to a club in downtown Orlando. I hadn't seen it in full in who knows how many years.

Anyhow, you likely know the plot already, but to explain anyway... as the Klingons are looking for Kirk to be prosecuted for what happened in the last film (and they showed footage from the last movie to show what happened, including the ship blowing up from the outside... um, how was that footage captured?), a strange probe heads towards Earth and wreaks havoc; it's odd how the idea of something mysterious heading towards Earth is quite similar to the first Star Trek movie with V'Ger. This time, the probe is from some mysterious civilization and they've talked to humpback whales for many thousands of years. When they became extinct in this century in this universe, they became curious so they went to Earth to try and find them... and they end up causing a lot of havoc with the oceans and all electricity and possibly ruining the planet forever. 

Meanwhile, Kirk and the crew are chillin on the Vulcan planet for 3 months, as they're apprehensive to go back to Earth to deal with Starfleet's punishments. I imagine the Vulcan planet isn't so much fun due to how logical Vulcans are and all... they decide to go back just as the probe is causing all that havoc. They decide to save Starfleet's ass once again, this time by time travelling in the Klingon Bird of Prey they hijacked, resulting in a really bizarre sequence that must be a blast or a terror to watch while high on drugs. They're in 1986 and they have to try and bring back humpback whales so that they can give the 411 to the probe for it to leave.

Sorry for the long plot description but it is easy to poke fun at the film even if you like it, and I do like it. Once they get to the 80's, boy is it wacky. It's a fish out of water story as the whole crew stands out for being weird in that time period with the way they act, their dress, and all that, and Spock is trying to get back to “normal” after what happened in the last film. There's a lot of comedy, and not all of it works. Still, despite some flaws, it is an entertaining popcorn movie as hey, it still has the characters I enjoy and it has a wacky tale to tell of how they would act in such a setting, and everyone has a chance to shine. It is hard to rate with the rest of the series due to how it stands out, though.

Before I gave it a view, I looked on its IMDb page and someone there asked a simple question, and to paraphrase, it was “Um, in the 60's show, it was established that the Earth of the late 20th century was definitely different because in the 90's, it was said that Khan was a ruler of a decent amount of the planet. Yet, in this movie, 1986 San Francisco is like how it was in real life. Insert the meme .gif of Ernie laughing while Bert looks up from his book with a blank look on his face. Yeah, there are some things with this movie that make me wonder, but it doesn't really affect my enjoyment, mind you.

One thing I did not remember from viewing it as a kid... this movie is not subtle. They lay it on thick with the ripping of how humans were in the late 20th century, from their pollution to how they use vulgarities often, from how “primitive” they are and how bad the idea of nuclear power is to how they don't give a damn about the environment. I don't want to say there's an agenda, but well... still, it is a nice message for humans not to abuse the environment and not eradicate entire species.

Oh, and amusingly, the punk song you hear during the great scene of Kirk & Spock dealing with the punk rocker on the bus (after the punk gives them the finger, Spock uses his Vulcan Neck Pinch to knock him out), the entire song is on YouTube. Awesome.



I won't be back until Thursday night, but I plan on writing about more than one movie with the next post.

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Bookies



Runtime: 90 minutes

Directed by: Mark Illsley

Starring: Nick Stahl, Johnny Galicki, Lukas Haas, Rachael Leigh Cook

From: Many different companies, including Motion Picture Corporation of America and Gemini Film

Yep, after way too long I watched another Rachael film. I figured today was an appropriate day to do so; today is Mother's Day and well, this past Tuesday it was announced that she and her husband Daniel Gillies (they've been married since August of '04) were going to have a kid for the first time in the fall. Congratulations to the couple. Anyway, as she's going to be a mom in a few months... I've had the DVD for awhile but tonight was the time to give it a viewing.

The plot: A trio of college kids on a ficticious campus in New York are bosom buddies; there is Toby (Stahl), a straight A student from high school; there is also loudmouth brash Jude (Galicki), and there's bookworm wallflower Casey (Haas). They all enjoy the thrill (and agony) of gambling on sporting events. Well, Jude gets the idea that they should become bookies themselves for the students on campus, despite there being in the area a pair of mobster types who handle that racket already (longtime character actors David Proval and John Diehl; both guys are “That Guy” sort of people you likely have seen before even if you didn't realize it, as both have been acting for a few decades now). Things start off fine at first and they enjoy the fat cash they get for the operation, and Toby is enjoying the budding romance with Hunter (Cook). But then problems happen, including Jude enjoying the nose candy, and the mobster types start to get angry...

Overall, this is not a great film but it isn't bad either. It's simply good and a fine way to spend an hour and a half. There aren't too many surprises... and it still is entertaining, even if you can tell at times this is a low-budget thing. At least the movie doesn't suck or is aggravating. Sure, Jude is a D-bag throughout and becomes an even bigger one after he gets money and becomes a cokehead, but that was the point. It is a rainy afternoon sort of movie if you do manage to track it down or actually see it play on TV somewhere. At least Rachael looks pretty hot as usual, IMO.

The most interesting thing about the movie to me is that it is set in America and all the characters are American, so the movie was actually filmed in... Cologne, Germany, disguised as a random city in New York state. I imagine someone or some company got them a really cheap deal to film in the city and use such sites in the city as the giant indoor arena now known as Lanxess Arena, which among other things held a UFC show, WWE house shows, and many concerts. The exteriors of that fancy-looking building was used to represent the college basketball arena on campus.

Like I said, this is a standard film which at least isn't bad, even if there's cliches and it could have been at least real good. I'll be back tomorrow night and I'll be back with talking about Star Trek. It turns out I won't be watching V or VI, but that is OK with me. At least I can start sooner on seeing the Fast & The Furious movies.