Little Caesar (1931)
Runtime:
79 minutes
Directed
by: Mervyn LeRoy
Starring:
Edward G. Robinson, Douglas Fairbanks Jr., Glenda Farrell, Sidney
Blackmer
From:
Warner Brothers
This
is officially the oldest film I've ever reviewed for this site,
although not the oldest one I've seen (I've seen some silent movies
in the past). I had seen this before via a TCM airing but that was
before I started this site and I don't remember too much about it. So
why not watch it tonight and add more variety to this blog and my
Letterboxd page?
The
plot of this movie that really started the gangster genre of the
1930's in Hollywood (and not only started Robinson's career but his
role became the stereotypical gangster motif) and it's an edited
version of what's on IMDb: “The
ambitious criminal Caesar Enrico “Rico” Bandello moves from the
country to the big city in the east and joins Sam Vettori's gang with
his friend Joe Massara. Sooner he becomes the leader of the gangsters
and known as Little Caesar.”
While
it is cliché by now, Robinson as the title character is still quite
entertaining and good. While I haven't seen enough of this specific
genre, I enjoy watching those old gangster movies from the '30's
where you have tough guys that can be sassy pretty often, clubs that
are front for illegal activities (especially alcohol, if it's a movie
made when the all-time terrible idea known as Prohibition was still a
thing), the cars of the era, and people being mowed down (especially
from a Tommy Gun)... I dig it.
The
story here wasn't too different from Scarface, the original or the
remake. There's a tough guy who moves to the big city to join a gang.
Like the remake he has a pal who has a love interest and he doesn't
seem as ambitious as his pal. He has to deal with a boss who he
argues with and he ends up throwing out the boss and he runs the
whole thing. He has conflict with the pal. He enjoys the big time but
his brashness and boldness that made him rise to the top was also his
downfall.
Interestingly,
some people say that Rico is a closeted homosexual; even the guy who
wrote the book on which the movie was based on thought the same. You
could look at it that way and it makes you look at the movie
differently, but it doesn't really affect things and you can view it
without that idea and it's still a quality movie. It's just one of
those theories for if you want to view the movie on multiple
occasions, you know.
Overall,
it's simply a good time and a look at how movies were different back
then; while you don't have such blatant stereotypes and accents
anymore, it is nice to see a bunch of tough guys utter clean dialogue
with a lot of sass and you still get the intent of how they're
feeling without any cursing or being too over the top; you also have women that look "healthier" than all those emaciated ladies that dominate the entertainment scene today due to lame and awful social pressures. I won't be
back until Sunday night.
No comments:
Post a Comment