High Pressure

High Pressure (1932)

Runtime: 74 minutes

Directed by: Mervyn LeRoy

Starring: William Powell, Evelyn Brent, George Sidney, John Wray, Evalyn Knapp

From: Warner Bros.

Some will be overjoyed to hear that that this hitherto difficult to track down motion picture can now easily be seen by those subscribed to the Criterion Channel. This month, they have a section devoted to 10 Pre-Code Mervyn Leroy films. Most are his expected hits-and some were already reviewed by me-but the other rarity part of the collection is 1934’s Hi, Nellie!

The plot of High Pressure is simple: William Powell is a cad named GAR EVANS who is a con artist. We first see Gar in the speakeasy after a bender, as drunk as Cooter Brown. A pal and a business find him & bring him to a spa. As he is refreshed in the spa (some will like that he spends several minutes sans shirt), the businessman tells him that he has a way of creating rubber… out of SEWAGE. That sounds like Number Two to me—but this is supposed to be silly yet fun, breezy entertainment.

Of course, Powell is great as the bold, self-assured con man who could sell ice cubes to Inuit people but there’s many Warner Bros. character actors that fill out the cast and there were things I appreciated, such as some great set design—Gar’s office in particular was awesome, rectangle shape-dominant on both the walls & the windows, & an ornate desk. There’s also the expected snappy patter and rapid-fire dialogue you’d expect, and with a romantic subplot, all in a tidy 74-minute package to boot.

The two lead female roles aren’t exactly dynamic but Evelyn Brent-as Gar’s girl-and Evalyn Knapp-as Gar’s secretary-both do a fine job. I’m glad the Criterion Channel made this film easy for fans of Old Hollywood to check out.

Send Help

Send Help (2026)

93% on Rotten Tomatoes (out of 234 reviews) 

Runtime: 113 minutes

Directed by: Sam Raimi

Starring: Mostly it's Rachel McAdams and Dylan O'Brien

From: 20th Century Studios

I didn’t love the ending to the film; it was something I was sour about last night in the hours after viewing Send Help on the big screen. After a good night’s sleep, I still don’t love that they made this narrative decision that was “modern cinema” in a negative sense (that was my problem with it, not my preference to one of the two lead characters in what was mainly a two-hander) and it feels like needless 21st century BS inserted into a motion picture that otherwise felt retro-even the usage of a 20th Century Studios logo that mimicked the old 20th Century Fox logo used in the early 70’s.

However, my negative opinion on that decision has lessened. Much of it I did enjoy; as hinted at in the trailers, Rachel McAdams is an awkward nerd at an office job (who loves reading survivalist literature & watching Survivor) who has a new A-hole boss that is the spoiled inexperience son of the old boss, and he’s a bratty jerk. After a plane crash, only those two remain, stuck on a stunning tropical island in Thailand.

The key to the film: both Rachel McAdams and Dylan O’Brien were great in their roles; I even believed that a conventionally attractive woman like McAdams could be an awkward nerd. The relationship between the two & how it evolved during their time on the island, how both weren’t black-and-white caricatures, the bloody and/or visceral moments… I was enjoying the movie even if you don’t factor in the detail that this is an original idea instead of a reboot, remake, or sequel.

I was happy that a great veteran director was able to make an original R-rated genre movie, w/ an interesting score from Danny Elfman. The CG has been the target of complaints; valid, although there was only a time or two where it was distracting and that’s more a modern industry problem so that doesn’t impact my opinion of Send Help.

I am disappointed that the ending fell flat with me. The movie otherwise was well-constructed w/ nice hints early on of the final act. Despite my misgivings, I still found the movie to be pretty good & am glad it was seen at a Dolby Cinema.

Arlington Road

Arlington Road (1999)

Runtime: 117 minutes

Directed by: Mark Pellington

Starring: Jeff Bridges, Tim Robbins, Joan Cusack, Hope Davis, Robert Gossett

From: Screen Gems 

This is another movie where I can deliver an interesting backstory related to it. In this case, around a quarter-century ago, a college roommate saw that the movie was on either HBO or Cinemax (our university’s dorms offered both on the cable package) so the channel-surfing stopped as Arlington Road was something he had seen before. Unfortunately, we only saw the final 20 to 25 minutes; despite being intrigued by what little I saw, because I am me it took literal decades for a full viewing.

A movie starring Jeff Bridges, Tim Robbins, & Joan Cusack is worthy of checking out, I say. Cusack is someone I should have seen more of by now, anyhow. Bridges is a paranoid college history professor who suspects that his neighbors are terrorists. What an interesting movie to watch in 2026 with all the talk of right-wing militias, distrust of the federal government, the FBI screwing up, bombings, and what have you.

It's an interesting film where Robbins has a suspicious past but is Bridges (who doesn’t trust the government; his wife was an FBI agent who died in a raid gone bad) making a mountain out of a molehill and is Robbins a changed man, or is Bridges right? In hindsight, I don’t mind waiting until I saw some 70’s paranoid conspiracy thrillers to view this late 90’s version of one. The movie isn’t as engaging or thrilling as something like All the President’s Men or The Conversation; that does not mean Arlington Road isn’t pretty good.

There’s electrifying scenes, a quality final act, good performances from the leads-including Hope Davis as the graduate student turned girlfriend-how awkward that is did get mentioned. The film is refreshingly like one from the 70’s-what reminded me of that era the most of course won’t be elaborated upon, because spoilers. The score from Angelo Badalamenti is a further asset. This isn’t without contrivances if you scrutinize the plot too hard. If you can avoid that…

It shouldn’t have taken a quarter-century but I’m relieved this loop has finally been closed.

 

Shrek 2

For the first time in over 20 years, I finally revisited Shrek 2. As mentioned in my review for Shrek a few months ago, the first sequel was witnessed on the big screen; unlike most, I didn’t love 2 as much as 1. Perhaps it was me as a young man then (now, I’m middle-aged, head full of grey hairs) but the specific reasons as to what let me down was lost long before finally revisiting the movie last night.

In 2026, I can’t explain what in the world I was thinking 22 years ago. There’s still laughs, pop culture references, lovely animation, interesting soundtrack choices (I did NOT remember that someone covered a Buzzcocks song) and further light teasing of fairy tales & their mythos as newlyweds Shrek & Fiona along w/ Donkey visit the in-laws, & we meet new memorable characters in the Fairy Godmother & Prince Charming, but of course the true highlight in newcomers is Puss in Boots. The voice acting from Antonio Banderas was top-notch, although the major stars new here (Julie Andrews, John Cleese, Rupert Everett, Jennifer Saunders, etc.) also equated themselves rather well.

Shrek 2 satirized Hollywood & its foibles in Far, Far Away; this was a further asset in my enjoyment of the film. There’s more than one fart joke but otherwise the adult humor can easily fly over the head of youngsters, making this better/more enjoyable for families & adults than too many 21st century animated pictures. This broadened the scope and gave the viewer more of what they liked about the original. Public opinion tells me that the third and fourth entries in this franchise are clearly lesser than the first two—there’s no rush for me to FINALLY see those for the first time.

Hex

Hex (Xie) (1980)

Runtime: 97 minutes

Directed by: Kuei-Chih Hung

Starring: Tanny Tien, Wang Yong, Chen Szu-Chia, Shum Lo, Lee Sau-Kei 

From: Shaw Brothers

A Shaw Brothers version of Les Diaboliques? Heck yes. Hopefully no one minds me spending the last few days viewing films from the same era. The 70’s and 80’s are something I dig, as implied or explicitly stated many times over the years. Furthermore, Arrow’s streaming platform is one that is always not viewed enough by me.

In 1919, Chun Yu is a real vile SOB; his wife’s family have experienced a downturn and she has both tuberculosis and pulmonary heart disease. He constantly physically abuses his sick wife, not to mention the maid. There’s also verbal and even sexual abuse. He’s so OOT in his awful behavior, everyone will be happy about his accidental turned on-purpose demise. The wife is haunted by the death by the death… how much this follows the model of the 1955 movie’s plot of course won’t be spoiled by me.

Disappointment will be had if you expect this to be nonstop bonkers like The Boxer’s Omen (this movie’s director also directed that) or was filled w/ gross-out gags. There are some goopy moments but the scares are more traditional. Sadly, there’s a 5 minute segment of bad “comedy” involving a pair of insufferable goofball men, one cross-eyed and the other such a sap that he pissed his pants out of fright. I was happy that only this segment featured the bad “comedy.”

The finale features the wackiness that more than a few likely prefer in their old Hong Kong horror. A female character (I won’t mention which one) suddenly appears fully nude in a row, gesticulating around as Moroder’s The Apartment-from the American Gigolo soundtrack-plays. She is then what I’ll describe as “beaten by la chancla!” Then, we get a scene “inspired” by a famous bit in 1964’s Kwaidan. Like I said, wacky.

The denouement is baffling in a bad way & is best recognized by me as not happening in my canon. Regardless, those knowing that this is a fun riff on a great movie in Les Diabloiques will go in w/ the correct expectations.

Futureworld

Futureworld (1976)

Runtime: 107 minutes

Directed by: Richard T. Heffron

Starring: Peter Fonda, Blythe Danner, Arthur Hill, John P. Ryan, Stuart Margolin

From: AIP

Viewing the sequel of the last film I watched seemed like a logical idea. 

I don’t plan on checking out the 5-episode Beyond Westworld TV show from 1980, but that may change one day years in the future. Naturally, Futureworld suffers in comparison to Westworld and Michael Crichton is missed. That said, my love of 70’s kitsch is an asset; how can I not smile at seeing pea green shag carpeting ON THE STAIRS of a two-story apartment in what was 1985 in this universe? Richard T. Heffron is at least a competent veteran director. The Prime Video description sadly gave away too much of the plot-although there was some obvious hints dropped early on that suggested where the story was headed… heck, the movie’s official posters also gave unsubtle hints as to the plot! 

Somehow, Palpa… er, I mean somehow Delos the resort reopened two years after the catastrophe presented in Westworld despite several dozen civilians dying. Spending the equivalent of almost 9 billion dollars evidently does wonders. Peter Fonda (print reporter) and Blythe Danner (TV newscaster)-who of course have a history w/ each other-are among the dignitaries invited to a preview of the new & improved Delos.

Even I can’t deny the flaws in logic, the preponderance of scenes set in the basement of a factory, the focus on the two leads after the opening act featured other characters in several different lands. There’s no character as menacing as The Gunslinger in Westworld, who many have accurately noted was a proto T-800, nor will you be reminded of Jurassic Park. Be that as it may, the 70’s sets and color schemes did some of the heavy lifting for me, as did the score from a returning Fred Karlin. Some of the sets were fancy, there’s hologram chess that reminded me of the scene in A New Hope, and there’s other wacky ideas present of life in this alternate 80’s. I also dug rogue employee Hank and his old model android lackey Clark. 

Heck, there’s even the first usage of CGI in this movie & even odder, this of all movies was apparently the first American movie to be wide-released in China, in 1979. Early CG in movies I know only a few things about… the latter, nothing is known about but both are rabbit holes that could possibly explored one day in the future.

In any event, I happened to enjoy this movie and its relaxed pacing; many don’t but I won’t fault them for finding the picture “dull” or even somnambulistic. The most WTF scene by far: Yul Brynner returned as the Gunslinger, albeit for only one like three minutes, in a moment shoehorned in which bears no relation to the rest of the plot. Danner has a dream inspired by the final few scenes in 2001: A Space Odyssey which involve the Gunslinger in increasingly bizarre moments; what a way for Brynner to end his career in either the last or next-to-last movie he filmed.

Westworld

Westworld (1973)

Runtime: An economical 88 minutes

Directed by: Michael Crichton

Starring: Richard Benjamin, James Brolin, Yul Brynner, Norman Bartold,  Alan Oppenheimer

From: MGM

In another later than posting for me, my plans for Wednesday changed so another rare phenomenon occurred: posting a review for a movie less than an hour after viewing. Finally tackling Westworld wasn’t a bad Plan B. Considering the movie was famous enough to inspire a prestigious HBO show that had a first season most loved and subsequent seasons that had a more polarizing reception… about time for me & a famous effort from a decade whose cinema I typically enjoy.

Through cultural osmosis, for years I’ve known of Westworld’s plot; this allowed me to write a decent amount of this review even before checking out the picture on Turner Classic Movies. Long ago I learned this concerned human-presenting androids in the theme park Delos that has three lands (Western, Roman, Medieval Europe; what I didn’t know was that this (according to Wiki, at least) was in the far-flung future of… 1983. For those concerned about AI, the malfunctioning and their subsequent murderous streak won’t assuage those fears. 

My opinion of a film that I should have viewed & reviewed many years ago: I had a very good time. A simple yet effective storytelling trick was used: Richard Benjamin is a nervous lawyer visiting for the first time while James Brolin (sadly w/o facial hair but still delivering a quality performance) is a veteran to the experience, explaining Delos, answering questions and offering encouragement on how to interact w/ the androids. Arguably, the best way to dump exposition and explain the world to the viewer as well.

I do understand why the idea was turned into a TV show; it’d be a great adult amusement to cosplay in a historical era and live out fantasies, including that of a badass hero. You can also have sex with the androids! It’s also wholly believable those machines would malfunction. Heck, while not related, when the plot point was mentioned that humanity “hadn’t perfected the hands” of the androids, of course I thought of AI and its issue w/ hands.

Westworld was quite enjoyable; of course I’d be fond of the early 70’s computer tech and witnessing the 1973 version of a screensaver. However, I was most captivated by the full, complete story that was satisfying despite the length of only 88 minutes. While I’d be curious to see the in-world explanation for how this was all created, but that was extraneous information for the story presented here. What we got was incredibly economical.

Much of the focus is on Benjamin and Brolin. At first, the former was kind of a dweeb but it wasn’t long before he was an enjoyable protagonist to follow. I’d never actually seen a Benjamin movie in full before. After the first two acts, Yul Brynner’s Gunslinger character (dressed like his character from The Magnificent Seven deliberately) becomes integral to the story. Further assets included the strong directing from Michael Crichton, some rad moments of cinematography from Gene Polito that sadly is missing from modern film and the vivid score from Fred Karlin which was more than just the expected Western score in the appropriate area.

As sometimes proclaimed by me, what a fool I was for not viewing the movie much sooner. Who knows if I’ll ever bother w/ just the first season of the Westworld TV show; despite its more lukewarm reputation, the 1976 sequel flick Futureworld is still on the table for me.